EXCHANGE RATE
The Philippine peso exhibited greater stability in 1999, trading
in a narrower range against the dollar compared to the previous
year. The exchange rate averaged at P 39.09/US$, appreciating by
4.4 percent from the 1998 average of P 40.89/US$. The appreciation
was mainly due to foreign exchange inflows through the equities
market, especially in the first half of the year, as well as the
slack corporate dollar demand from restrained industrial activity.
Net direct investments and net portfolio investments in the first
half of 1999 grew by 32.6 percent and 71.2 percent, respectively.
For the first half of 2000, the Philippine peso averaged P 41.26/US$,
a depreciation of around 7.6 percent as against P 38.34/US$ of the
first half of 1999.
FISCAL POLICY
Government spending rose by 15.2 percent to P 590.16 billion in
1999 resulting in a deficit in the governments cash operations by
P 111.66 billion. The government¡¯s pump-priming activities caused
government expenditures to exceed the target level of P 576 billion
by P 14.2 billion. Meanwhile, the slow growth in manufacturing and
other industrial sectors contributed to a narrower tax base and
lower collection performance. Consequently, revenue collection only
increased by 3.5 percent in 1999 (P 478.5 billion), lower by P 12.2
billion than the 1999 target level of P 490.7 billion.
Government expenditures exceeded total government revenue collection
by P 47.69 billion in the first half of 2000 as government tax revenues
increased by only 5.5 percent from P215.95 billion in the first
half of 1999 to P 227.87 billion. The total revenue collection was
likewise below the programmed level of P 268.26 billion for year
2000. The lower revenue collection was caused by the shortfall in
privatization proceeds which only amounted to P 1.36 billion against
the programmed P 15.45 billion, as well as reduced collections by
the Bureau of Internal Revenue which grew by only 2.9 percent during
the first semester. Sixty percent of total government¡¯s expenditure
was allocated for the use of the national government, 20 percent
for interest payments and 18 percent for allotment to local government
units.
MONETARY POLICY
Domestic liquidity grew by 19.3 percent in 1999. A more accommodative
monetary policy through a low interest rate environment helped achieve
the better than expected inflation rate in 1999 at 6.6 percent.
Measures to reduce intermediation cost and to spur bank lending
by the private/business sector were implemented. The reserve requirements
were reduced from 17 percent in October 1998 to 12 percent in July
1999. The overnight borrowing rate by the central monetary authority
(Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas ¨C BSP) was also cut to 8.75 percent
in November 1999 from 13.5 percent as of December 1998, and its
lending rate to 11.8 percent in December 1999 from 15.4 percent
in December 1998. Further, the application of the 2 percent general
loan-loss provision was relaxed, while the Exporters¡¯ Dollar Facility
was expanded to include yen-denominated loans.
New regulatory guidelines enhanced the stability of the banking
system. Disclosure requirements for banks, entailing quarterly information
on non-performing loans, amount of specific and general loan-loss
reserves, return on equity, and loans to insiders, have been widened
to include even those that are unlisted at the Philippine Stock
Exchange. Banks were also required to increase their capitalization
in 2000 with accompanying remedial actions and sanctions for banks
with capital deficiencies. The Philippine Central Bank (BSP) has
completed its first-generation early warning system for commercial
banks which can predict a bank¡¯s capitalization ration or solvency
one year ahead. To promote consolidation, the BSP imposed an indefinite
moratorium on the establishment of new banks except in cities and
municipalities where there are no existing banking offices and under
other special conditions.
In 2000, the government¡¯s monetary policy continued to aim for
a decline in inflation and broad stability in foreign exchange while
ensuring that interest rates are reasonably low to support economic
growth. The exchange rate continued to be market determined and
build up of foreign reserves was pursued to the extent allowed by
monetary and foreign exchange market conditions.
Likewise, the policies which were instrumental in supporting the
country through the crisis of 1997 continued to be followed including
implementation of prudent fiscal and monetary policies, liberalization
and privatization of the banking sector, proactive management of
external debt and progressive development of capital markets.
MEDIUM-TERM OUTLOOK
A fairly strong performance in GDP in 1999 highlighted by a robust
growth in merchandise exports, expansion in output of the production
sectors, i.e., agriculture, industry and services as well as a low
inflation rate showed that the economy is well on track to achieve
the government¡¯s growth and inflation targets. Further, based on
a strong performance in the first half 2000, the Philippines is
likely to achieve the target of at least 4 per cent growth in GDP
for the whole of 2000. Agriculture, fishery and forestry is predicated
to grow by 2.5 percent, industry by 4 percent, and services by 4.1
percent in 2000. The inflation rate is expected to be kept within
single digit level at 5 percent.
For 2001, the GDP growth target will range from 4 percent to 5
percent. The growth for next year hinges on strong export growth,
higher fiscal spending on capital outlays especially for foreign-assisted
projects, and recovery of bank lending. Inflation is expected to
increase in 2001 to 6 ¨C 6.5 percent due to lagged effects of the
increase in oil prices and the weaker peso in 2000, and the impact
of the El Nino on food prices.
However, the government will continue to assess the impact of the
peso-dollar rate, oil prices, and world interest rates on the economy
and on the growth and inflation targets.
PHILIPPINES: OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
1st Sem 2000
|
GDP and Major Components (% change,
year over year, except as noted)
|
Nominal GDP (million US$)
|
52976
|
54368
|
64084
|
74120
|
82848
|
82344
|
65492
|
76655
|
37618
|
Real GDP
|
0.3
|
2.1
|
4.4
|
4.7
|
5.9
|
5.2
|
-0.6
|
3.3
|
3.9
|
Total Consumption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Consumption
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
3.7
|
3.8
|
4.6
|
5.0
|
3.4
|
2.6
|
3.2
|
Government Consumption
|
-0.9
|
6.2
|
6.1
|
5.6
|
4.1
|
4.6
|
-1.9
|
5.3
|
-0.5
|
Total Investment
|
7.8
|
7.9
|
8.7
|
3.5
|
12.5
|
11.7
|
-16.3
|
-1.7
|
-2.0
|
Exports of Goods and Services
|
4.3
|
6.2
|
19.8
|
12.0
|
15.4
|
17.2
|
-21.0
|
3.6
|
12.3
|
Imports of Goods and Services
|
8.7
|
11.5
|
14.5
|
16.0
|
16.7
|
13.5
|
-14.7
|
-2.8
|
-1.0
|
Fiscal and External Balances (% of
GDP)
|
Budget Balance
|
-1.2
|
-1.5
|
1.0
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
-1.9
|
-3.7
|
-0.3
|
Merchandise Trade Balance
|
-8.9
|
-11.4
|
-12.2
|
-12.1
|
-13.7
|
-13.5
|
-0.04
|
5.6
|
6.36
|
Current Account Balance
|
-1.6
|
-5.5
|
-4.6
|
-4.4
|
-4.8
|
-5.3
|
2.4
|
9.5
|
9.5
|
Capital Account Balance
|
3.5
|
5.2
|
7.1
|
4.6
|
13.4
|
8.0
|
0.7
|
-0.9
|
-3.9
|
Economic Indicators (% change year
over year earlier period, except as noted)
|
GDP Deflator (percent change)
|
7.9
|
6.8
|
10.0
|
7.6
|
7.7
|
6.0
|
10.7
|
8.6
|
6.1
|
CPI (% change) 1994=100
|
8.6
|
7.0
|
8.3
|
8.0
|
9.1
|
6.0
|
9.8
|
6.6
|
3.4
|
M2 (percent change)
|
11.0
|
24.6
|
26.8
|
25.2
|
15.8
|
20.5
|
8.0
|
19.3
|
11.3
|
Short-term Interest Rate (%)
|
16.1
|
12.3
|
13.6
|
11.3
|
12.4
|
13.1
|
15.3
|
10.2
|
8.9
|
Exchange Rate (P/US$)
|
25.5
|
27.1
|
26.4
|
25.7
|
26.2
|
29.5
|
40.9
|
39.09
|
41.09
|
Unemployment Rate (percent)
|
9.8
|
9.3
|
9.5
|
9.5
|
8.6
|
8.7
|
10.1
|
9.7
|
11.6
|
Population (millions)
|
65.3
|
67.0
|
68.6
|
70.3
|
71.9
|
73.5
|
75.2
|
76.8
|
78.0
|
-as of 5 October 2000 |