The United States enjoyed continued strong growth with low and
stable inflation in 1999, extending the current expansion while
continuing to build up the budget surplus.
GDP GROWTH RATE
Real gross domestic product (GDP) grew 4.2 percent from 1998 to
1999, marking the 8th consecutive year of positive output growth.
Strong growth continued in the first quarter of 2000 as real GDP
grew 4.8 percent at an annual rate.
Real personal consumption expenditures grew a robust 5.3 percent
in 1999, exceeding 1998¡¯s 4.9 percent growth rate, and accounted
for over 80 percent of real GDP growth. Favorable economic performance
helped fuel strong household spending. Real disposable personal
income grew 4 percent and the stock market continued to soar, with
the Wilshire 5000 ending the year up 22 percent, and measures of
consumer confidence reached all-time highs. Stocks were somewhat
volatile over the first four months of 2000; nevertheless, consumer
confidence remained high and real household spending grew a robust
7.6 percent at an annual rate in the first quarter of 2000.
Real investment grew 5.8 percent in 1999, down from the double-digit
growth rates recorded in 1997 and 1998. Real business fixed investment
grew 8.3 percent over the year, fueled by large increases in spending
on computers and other information processing equipment, while spending
on business structures fell. Real residential investment surged
7.4 percent in 1999, in part reflecting relatively low mortgage
rates as well as rising wealth. Residential investment continued
its strong growth over the first quarter of 2000, but forward-looking
indicators suggest a slowdown in the coming months.
Real net exports exerted a drag on GDP growth in 1999 for the fourth
year in a row. Real exports began to pick up in the second half
of 1999 as foreign economies began to rebound and rose 3.8 percent
for the year. But to satisfy growing domestic demand, real imports
grew even faster at 11.7 percent.
INFLATION
Broad price measures showed a slight pick-up in inflation in 1999
from the very low pace in 1998. The chain-weighted price indexes
for GDP and PCE increased 1.4 percent and 1.6 percent respectively
on a year-over-year basis, both up slightly from their year-earlier
rates. The consumer price index (CPI) rose 2.2 percent in 1999,
up from 1.6 percent in 1998, but dramatic increases in energy prices
accounted for all of this acceleration. Core measures of inflation,
which exclude volatile food and energy prices, were even more subdued.
Core PCE inflation was 1.4 percent on a year-over-year basis in
1999, up only 0.1 percentage point from 1998, while the core consumer
price index actually showed a slow-down in the rate of inflation,
increasing 2.2 percent in 1999, 0.2 percentage point less than its
year-earlier rate.
EMPLOYMENT
The high-pressure U.S. labor market continued its strong performance
in 1999 as nearly 2.5 million private non-farm jobs were created.
Federal government payrolls fell for the seventh straight year.
The service sector added 1.4 million new jobs in 1999, an increase
of nearly 4 percent. In contrast, employment in the manufacturing
sector, which was particularly hard hit by weak export demand, fell
for the second straight year.
The annual unemployment rate dipped to 4.2 percent, its lowest
level since 1969. These labor market gains were widely shared as
Hispanic and African-American unemployment rates both dropped to
historic lows.
The participation rate ¨C the percentage of the population over
age 16 that is either employed or looking for work ¨C remained at
its all-time high of 67.1 percent for the third straight year.
Strong productivity growth in 1999 helped to keep wage inflation
in check despite the very low unemployment rate. Unit labor costs
increased only 1.7 percent on a year-over-year basis in 1999. Meanwhile,
output per hour in the non-farm business sector rose 3 percent and
helped to support real wage gains of 3.7 percent.
TRADE ACCOUNTS
The current account deficit grew to $339 billion in 1999, or 3.7
percent of GDP. The balance on goods and services was $268 billion,
as a merchandise trade deficit of $347 billion was partially offset
by a services surplus of $80 billion.
EXCHANGE RATE
The US dollar held fairly steady in real terms against a broad
trade-weighted worldwide average of other currencies in 1999. The
exchange rate rose slightly over the first quarter of 1999 before
retracing its steps over the last few months of the year. In the
first four months of 2000, the dollar strengthened steadily, bringing
the exchange rate up to levels not seen since mid-1998.
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
In 1999, U.S. direct investment abroad was $152 billion while foreign
direct investment into the United States was $283 billion.
FISCAL POLICY
The Federal Government ran a surplus (on a unified budget basis)
for fiscal year 1999 of $124 billion, compared with $69 billion
in 1998. This marked the first time in over 40 years that the Federal
Government has recorded two consecutive budget surpluses. At 1.4
percent of GDP in 1999, the fiscal surplus was the largest relative
to the size of the economy in nearly 50 years.
MONETARY POLICY
Amid concern over the potential buildup of inflationary imbalances,
the Federal Reserve raised the target Federal funds rate by 75 basis
points in three steps over 1999, fully reversing the rate cuts it
had instituted in 1998 during the global financial crisis. Over
the first six months of 2000, the Fed raised rates three times,
stating that the near-term risks are weighted mainly toward conditions
that may generate heightened inflation.
MEDIUM TERM OUTLOOK
The economy¡¯s remarkable performance has continued into the new
millennium. As of June, this business cycle expansion has lasted
111 months. The small increase in inflation this year was largely
due to the surge in world oil prices.
As of late July 2000, the consensus of private forecasters now
expects growth to slow to 3.5 percent annual rate in the final three
quarters of 2000. If this business/private sector consensus comes
to pass, the growth rate for the year as a whole will be 4.8 percent,
the same as the Administration¡¯s projection in its Mid-Session review.
The private-sector consensus expects GDP to decelerate to 3.3 percent
annual rate of growth for 2001 as a whole. The Administration expects
a similar deceleration, to 3.2 percent.
Both supply- and demand-side considerations argue for some moderation
in real GDP growth from its rapid 4.4 percent annual pace of the
past twelve quarters. The unemployment rate has fallen about 0.4
percentage point per year over this period, indicating that this
growth rates is well above its potential. The labor market is very
tight as indicated by low unemployment in June and increases in
real wages. It is doubtful whether a further decline of the unemployment
rate could be accommodated without inflationary consequences. Labor
force growth has not kept up with demand in the past two years,
nor can it be expected to keep up with growth at such a pace in
the future. Finally, some components of demand that contributed
to the rapid growth of the past few years, such as business demand
for capital goods, are not those likely to be sustainable over the
long run.
The U.S. Administration projects U.S. long run GDP growth at about
3.0 percent per year through 2006. This rate is consistent with
growth for the 1990 business cycle as a whole and with labor force
growth of approximately 1 percent and labor productivity growth
of approximately 2 percent.
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
In 1999, the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB) markedly
changed the way in which financial institutions meet the needs of
the American people. This act updates the rules that have governed
financial institutions since the great depression and relaxes prohibitions
on affiliations among banks, security firms and insurance companies.
By allowing banks to merge with other financial institutions, GLB
aims to stimulate competition, increase consumer choice and reduce
costs for consumers, communities and businesses. The act also provides
protection of consumer privacy and encourages banks to meet the
credit needs of under-served communities.
USA: OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
GDP and Major Components
(% change, year over year - earlier period, except as
noted)
|
Nominal GDP (level in billion US$)
|
7054.3
|
7400.6
|
7813.2
|
8300.7
|
8760.0
|
9256.2
|
Real GDP
|
4.0
|
2.7
|
3.6
|
4.2
|
4.3
|
4.2
|
Consumption
|
3.1
|
2.4
|
2.7
|
3.2
|
4.2
|
4.8
|
Private Consumption
|
3.8
|
3.0
|
3.2
|
3.4
|
4.9
|
5.3
|
Government Consumption
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
2.2
|
1.3
|
2.6
|
Investment
|
10.6
|
3.0
|
8.1
|
10.0
|
10.5
|
6.3
|
Private Investment
|
13.2
|
3.0
|
9.0
|
11.5
|
11.7
|
5.8
|
Government Investment
|
-0.1
|
2.7
|
3.9
|
2.4
|
4.0
|
9.0
|
Exports
|
8.9
|
10.3
|
8.2
|
12.5
|
2.2
|
3.8
|
Imports
|
12.0
|
8.2
|
8.6
|
13.7
|
11.6
|
11.7
|
Fiscal and External
Balances (% of GDP)
|
Budget Balance
|
-3.0
|
-2.6
|
-1.8
|
-0.6
|
0.5
|
1.2
|
Merchandise Trade Balance
|
-2.4
|
-2.3
|
-2.4
|
-2.4
|
-2.8
|
-3.8
|
Current account balance
|
-1.7
|
-1.5
|
-1.7
|
-1.7
|
-2.5
|
-3.7
|
Capital and financial account balance
(1)
|
1.9
|
1.8
|
2.5
|
3.4
|
2.4
|
4.1
|
Economic Indicators
(% change year over year - earlier period, except as noted)
|
GDP Deflator
|
2.1
|
2.2
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.2
|
1.5
|
CPI
|
2.6
|
2.8
|
2.9
|
2.3
|
1.6
|
2.2
|
M2
|
1.4
|
2.1
|
4.8
|
4.9
|
7.4
|
7.5
|
Short-term Interest Rate (Percent) (2)
|
4.4
|
5.7
|
5.1
|
5.2
|
4.9
|
4.8
|
Real effective exchange rate (level,
1996=100) (3)
|
106.9
|
100.0
|
106.0
|
115.4
|
123.2
|
124.4
|
Unemployment Rate (Percent)
|
6.1
|
5.6
|
5.4
|
4.9
|
4.5
|
4.2
|
Population (millions)
|
260.3
|
262.8
|
265.2
|
267.7
|
270.3
|
272.9
|
(1)Capital account balance excludes the statistical
discrepancy
(2) Short-term interest rate refers to average 3-Month Treasury Bill
Market Bid Yield at Constant Maturity (%)
(3) Real effective exchange rate from IMF International Financial
Statistics, August 2000, and IMF communication.
|